
There was a lengthy debate. Some felt that the internet definitely gives a voice to the minority. They spoke about how you can research on things and hear their voice through movies, articles and posts that you may not have been able to experience if it was not for the internet. The internet also gives a sense of anonymity as to prevent a reader from knowing whether the person who created the article, post or video is of the ethnic or social majority or minority. This helps to eliminate biases based upon racism and sexism.
Their was another group who believed that the internet fits neither strongly on one side or the other. They agreed with all the things that the group above made but they struggled to accept that regulators of internet content in our country do not play a role in oppressing the thoughts of the minority. When you google something, google spits out an answer based on who pays more to be found by google or what has been viewed the most before. This limits the ability of under privileged and new views from being found and viewed, favouring the "Dominant White Male" Also the government limits and blocks certain things from our internet. In the USA the government has the right to track your internet use and use it to incriminate you. These types of things are definitely not privileging the minorities.I tend to agree that the internet takes a very middle ground on this issue of privileging the majority or minority. The internet is a representation of society at large but it is generally dominated by youth making it a glimpse at society in the future. This makes me happy because the internet my not provide complete equality for all people but it definitely provides more equality then society at large does currently.
The future with the internet looks good as long as it remains as open as it is and hopefully becomes better at representing minorities as an equal in the online society.



.jpg)